![]() ![]() In analysing what is meant by local ownership, this article will also argue that, in practice, the concept is narrowly interpreted both in terms of how SSR programmes are controlled and the extent to which those at the level of the community are actively engaged. ![]() This article examines reasons for this gap, including concerns regarding limited capacity and lack of expertise, time and cost constraints, the allure of quantifiable results and quick wins, and the need to ensure that other principles inherent to SSR are not disregarded. Nonetheless, there remains a gap between policy and practice. Security Sector Reform, Local Ownership and Community Engagementĭirectory of Open Access Journals (Sweden)įull Text Available Local ownership is widely considered to be one of the core principles of successful Security Sector Reform (SSR programmes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |